Urbana Yoke Parish is a church in trouble. If you have ask ‘what kind of trouble,’ you are not paying attention.
On any given Sunday you can look around at the congregation
and see that attendance is down. You say to yourself, “We used to have twenty
kids come forward to hear a Children’s Story, we used to have teenagers, we
used to have young adults! Where are they?” That is a good question.
The answer is simple, really. We have had our share of
deaths over the last couple of years. We also have some people who have
transitioned to being shut-ins. That could change for some of those, but for
now it is a fact of life. And as far as the young adults and the kids, most
have left because there is nothing for the kids.
I have been told that those that have left should suck it up
and create something for the kids. Maybe twenty years ago, maybe even ten years
ago. But that doesn’t work for today. The world has changed. It is hard enough
to raise your own kids. Unless you have a calling for it, working with the kids
of other people is a high stress endeavor.
How does this make Urbana Yoke Parish a church in trouble?
Although financially stable right now, that will begin to change over the next
little while. A few more deaths, a few more shut-ins and the whole aspect of
the church will change. Without younger people, the generation that makes up
the Yoke now, will be the last. And that will be the result of what this
generation does or does not do. You don’t have to go very far to find churches
that have failed. We can say that we are not the only ones, but it doesn’t have
to be.
A Feasibility Committee was appointed by the Board to look
at the problem and come up with a recommendation. That has been done and will
be presented to the Board at the July meeting. From there it will be decided
how to proceed and that will be brought to the congregation. But it has been established that there are four major options
we can pursue:
1.) Do
nothing. Let the church die and do not worry about the future.
2.) Get
someone from the congregation or hire a part timer to generate something for
the young people.
3.) Have
the Pastor resign and call a new Pastor who can and will work with young people,
as well.
4.) Call
someone who is prepared by education, experience and Spiritual calling to
fulfill this role. It would involve Youth, Education, maybe music for the
younger ones. Plus whatever else can be given to them.
For
the first one, that is the easy way. But to go that route means that all the
work put into the building is wasted, all the money spent is down the drain and
all the history of two churches is done.
On
the second one, no one in the church has the desire. And don’t feel badly
toward anyone. Remember, you aren’t offering either. Getting a part timer.
Well, I have personally worked on that. Part timers usually come from within
your own church. If they were from another church and they were interested in working with kids, they would do
it in their own church. Manchester University does not have a ministry
division, per se. They do offer a pre-ministry course. It doesn’t look very
impressive for what we need, especially as it includes ecumenicism in their
offering. They also offer a diversity and inclusiveness course to go along with
pre-ministry. Draw your own conclusions. Manchester is a very fine liberal arts
college, but they are no longer the religious school they were two generations
ago. Two years ago I contacted Huntington University. The job was posted, but I
was told there was no interest because the church is so far away from the
school. Seriously. Besides, that, would someone who is going to be here for a
short time (six months to a year) really fill the need?
The
third option involves my resignation and finding a Pastor who will do both
jobs. If the church chooses this option, then I will resign. But finding a
Pastor who will do both and do it well is very problematic. That is a special
calling and there are very few out there.
The
fourth option is calling a person to fill the position. That requires a
financial investment. It requires a level of commitment the church has not had
to reach before. It requires the ability to change our thinking. Although, with
everything we have been through in the last five years or so, this church has
gotten pretty good at changing the thinking.
Several
have raised the question of why do we need someone for Youth if we have no
Youth. Let’s envision something. A huge grocery store is going to be built
right in Urbana. Big place. It is going to have everything in the way of food.
A discount pharmacy. Special parking for tractors. This store is going to be
great. Lots of buzz about it. As it begins to be built everyone, including you,
is getting more and more excited. Finally, the big day comes. You come early to
get in first. It was OK because they had the outside of the store air
conditioned and it was comfortable. People are ready. Finally, the doors open
and the crowd, including you, surges in. And everyone stops. Every cash
register is manned, music is playing, shopping carts are all new. But there is
not one single grocery item on the shelves. Everything is bare. The manager is
standing there beaming with pride and you ask him, Where is the food? He
replies, Oh, we had to wait until we knew we would have customers. Since we
have customers, we will go ahead and order the food. It will get here one day.
OK,
that is silly, I know. But it is really the same idea as why have something for
Youth when we have no Youth. A young family sees a church that obviously cares
for its appearance. They want to change churches and go to a non-denominational
church. They decide to give the Yoke a try. They come in with their three kids,
six years old, nine years old and thirteen years old. They see no children and
assume that all the kids in the church are off somewhere in their own part of
the church. The Mom asks you where her kids go. What do you say to her? Do they
ever come back? And that is not silly. It is just profoundly sad.
Choices,
options, the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment